Tornado-Related Emergency Tree Removal Case Study
Learn how HMI’s emergency tree removal process after a spring tornado allowed an adjuster to move forward with the claim process without delays.
Case Study: Commercial Equipment Smoke & Water Damage Claim
An adjuster enlisted TechLoss Consulting & Restoration to assess fire, smoke, and water damage to dozens of commercial-grade washers and dryers. Learn more.
Car Wash Equipment Claim Case Study
A vehicle impact damage claim involving specialized car wash equipment required objective expertise. Learn how TechLoss Consulting & Restoration delivered.
HVAC Water Damage Claim Case Study
See how HVACi’s on-site assessment verified the true extent of water damage to a furnace and determined whether it required replacement.
Scary Story: Ignoring Underlying Equipment Damage
Manufacturing equipment was still jamming after a fire loss, despite being cleaned. Find out how TechLoss Consulting & Restoration identified the true scope of damage.
Tree Removal Invoice Review Case Study
Learn what HMI considered during a tree removal invoice audit to help an adjuster determine if the costs aligned with market rates for the work completed.
Tree Limb Impact Claim Case Study
Discover how Donan Engineering determined the scope of damage for an adjuster’s claim in which a tree limb snapped and impacted a detached garage.
Range Cooktop Fire Claim Case Study
An adjuster turned to National Fire Experts (NFE) to determine how a range fire ignited without reported cooking activity. Request the case study for the full story.
Scary Story: Questionable Property Theft Details
A policyholder received a property theft settlement, but a revised claim raised questions. Learn how VRC Investigations verified details for the adjuster.
Workers’ Compensation Claim Investigation Case Study
Learn how a multi-faceted investigation uncovered social media activity that referenced “dancing in the snow” and raised questions about a workers’ comp claim.
Alpine Intel’s content is meant to inform and educate readers using general terms and descriptions. They do not replace expert evaluations that determine facts and details related to each unique claim.