Subrogation Insights: When To Investigate a Product Failure
This article explains the types of losses that are well-suited for product failure investigations, helping insurance professionals optimize their subrogation processes.
Lithium-Ion Battery Fires: Causes and Subrogation Potential
Read about the causes of lithium-ion battery fires, the role of manufacturers’ defects, and how expert testing can help you evaluate subrogation potential.
Unlocking Subrogation Potential in Property Loss Claims eBook
Download this eBook to get actionable strategies for optimizing your subrogation efforts through expert product failure testing.
What Could Constitute a Subrogation Claim
Installation errors and manufacturers’ defects can both signal subrogation claim potential. Learn more about each and why considering subrogation matters.
Installation Error: Component Failure Case Study
Component Testing Laboratories used non-destructive testing to uncover an installation error behind a CPVC tubing failure, aiding the adjuster in assessing subrogation potential.
Toilet Failure Case Study: A Single-Line Chain of Custody
Find out how CTL safely documented, moved, and tested a fractured toilet using in-house services, so that the adjuster could evaluate subrogation potential.
Best Practices for Evidence Management in Subrogation Cases
Discover essential strategies for documenting, preserving, and storing evidence to reduce the risk of spoliation and build stronger subrogation cases.
Corrosion Types That Could Signal Subrogation Potential
Learn about corrosion that could point to a manufacturer’s defect and subrogation potential, revealed by experts through component and product failure testing.
Non-Destructive vs. Destructive Product Failure Testing Case Study
Read about how CTL’s Professional Engineers used non-destructive and destructive testing to help a subrogation firm pinpoint the cause of a plastic pipe leak.
Leveraging Event Data Retrieval as an Auto Claims Adjuster
Discover how event data retrieval can reveal critical details in vehicle claims and prove useful, should these claims enter litigation.
Alpine Intel’s content is meant to inform and educate readers using general terms and descriptions. They do not replace expert evaluations that determine facts and details related to each unique claim.