Desktop vs. Field Investigation: Know the Differences Guide

Each investigative approach should be as unique as the claim itself to ensure you have the necessary evidence to make an accurate claim decision. When indicators of potential misrepresentation arise, a desktop investigation may be enough, while some red flags call for a field investigation. But the most complex claims need both if an adjuster suspects potential misrepresentation.
Download this guide to learn about the differences between these approaches to investigating claims details, the benefits of each, and when to bring in an experienced investigator.
You’ll gain additional insights through:
- Exploring the distinctions between evidence gathering for field and desktop investigations
- Learning about the lengths Special Investigation Units will go to legally and objectively discover the facts of a claim
- Reviewing use cases for both types of investigations
Fill out this form to receive a copy of the guide.
Don’t miss insurance-focused resources and webinars about property, perils, and trends impacting claims nationwide by signing up for The Savvy Adjuster Newsletter.
Be sure to also tune in to The Savvy Adjuster Podcast to hear more from the experts themselves.
Alpine Intel’s content is meant to inform and educate readers using general terms and descriptions. They do not replace expert evaluations that determine facts and details related to each unique claim.
Download Your Copy
Related Resources
Onsite Assessments and Desktop Reviews Guide
Compare the uses and benefits of obtaining either an onsite assessment or a desktop review with our one-page guide.
Social Media Investigation Do’s and Don’ts Guide
Learn how to navigate the ever-changing social media environment with these do’s and don’ts for conducting online investigations.
Adjuster’s Glossary of Fire Investigation Terms Guide
It takes a certified investigator to fully evaluate the origin and cause of many fires, and the investigation may include jargon you aren’t familiar with.



